Specter of Bromday Dispute Will Haunt Advisory Panel Discussion of Ophthalmic Product Labeling Changes
This article was originally published in The Pink Sheet Daily
Ista Pharmaceuticals’ rejected sNDA for a larger fill size of its ocular agent Bromday won’t be on the formal agenda, but the company will be presenting at the meeting, and the subject is bound to be on the minds of FDA’s Dermatologic and Ophthalmic Drugs Advisory Committee.
You may also be interested in...
Bromday Larger Bottle Gets Wink From Advisory Cmte. Still Torn On Safety
FDA’s Dermatologic and Ophthalmic Drugs Advisory Committee said there are good reasons for FDA to approve larger fill sizes for Ista’s ocular anti-inflammatory drops, although there isn’t enough evidence to say using them in both eyes would be safe.
ISTA’s Bromday Hearing Request Should Be Deferred Pending Cmte. Review, CDER Says
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research tells FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg that resource and regulatory policy considerations warrant postponing action on ISTA’s request for a formal evidentiary hearing on its rejected application for a larger fill size.
ISTA To Challenge FDA’s Refusal To Approve Bromday sNDA, Testing Little-Used Hearing Process
An unusual regulatory situation involving ISTA Pharmaceuticals’ ophthalmic drug Bromday could put FDA in the position of testing an infrequently used procedure for refusing to approve an application.