Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

Hatch-Waxman Safe Harbor Ruling Wrong In GSK Case, Solicitor General Says, But Should Not Be Reviewed

This article was originally published in The Pink Sheet Daily

Executive Summary

Supreme Court should not take up GlaxoSmithKline v. Classen given the Federal Circuit’s subsequent decision in Momenta v. Amphastar, the Solicitor General argues; Momenta plans to seek review of its case.

You may also be interested in...



Supreme Court Won’t Inoculate GSK In Hatch-Waxman Safe Harbor Case; Momenta May Have Better Shot

The high court also denied petitions seeking review of Otsuka’s Abilify patent and patents covering Cephalon’s Amrix; Supreme Court to hear oral arguments in generic preemption and “pay-for-delay” cases in March.

Supreme Court To Reconsider “Rules Of the Road” In Generic Preemption

Design defect claims made against generic companies are focus of a case involving Mutual Pharmaceutical’s generic sulindac; ruling may eliminate lower court carve-outs to its Mensing decision.

The End Of Pay-For-Delay? FTC Sees An Opportunity In AndroGel Lawsuit

Reverse payment settlements are a popular tactic for settling patent disputes between brand companies and their generic competitors. The Federal Trade Commission has aggressively (but mostly unsuccessfully) fought “pay-for-delay” deals in the courts, arguing that they drive up drug prices. Now FTC has its best chance yet at convincing the Supreme Court to hear the issue. Is this the end of pay-for-delay?

Related Content

Topics

Related Companies

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

LL1126230

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel