Generic Firms Get Supreme Shield From Product Liability, But Court Hints At Reg Change

This article was originally published in The Pink Sheet Daily

23 Jun 2011
News

The Pink Sheet Daily pinkeditor@informa.com

Executive Summary

In Pliva v. Mensing, the high court said it was impossible for generic manufacturers to comply with both state tort laws and FDA regulations requiring them to have the same labels as those for brand name counterparts.

Already Registered? Sign in to continue reading.

New to Pink Sheet? Start a free trial today!

Table
View full table

Topics

Industries
BioPharmaceutical

ASK THE ANALYST
Email

Print
Bookmark
Share

Tags:

BioPharmaceutical

You must sign in to use this functionality

Authentication.SignIn.HeadSignInHeader

PS072413

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel

PS072413

All set! This article has been sent to my@email.address.

All fields are required. For multiple recipients, separate email addresses with a semicolon.

Please Note: Only individuals with an active subscription will be able to access the full article. All other readers will be directed to the abstract and would need to subscribe.

Generic Firms Get Supreme Shield From Product Liability, But Court Hints At Reg Change

News

Executive Summary

Related Content

Topics

You must sign in to use this functionality

Authentication.SignIn.HeadSignInHeader

Register

Ask The Analyst

Email Article

Sign In To Set a Search Alert