Professional Medical Associations Should Accept Zero Industry Funding, Scientists Say
This article was originally published in The Pink Sheet Daily
An article published in JAMA proposes that professional medical organizations stop accepting money from health care manufacturers in order to reduce conflicts of interest, whether real or perceived.
You may also be interested in...
ACOs have been one of the most hyped innovations in the US health care sector this decade. The buzz may be overdone, but ACOs are now established as a different—and confusing—new customer segment for pharma. How is industry adjusting?
Pharma companies are building long-term value propositions that should appeal to Accountable Care Organizations into some go-to-market strategies for new drugs and to repositioning efforts of already marketed drugs that have hit snags. The rationale might seem straightforward—for example, more convenient dosing that improves compliance and cuts down hospitalization rates--but the nuances can be complex. Moreover, even when their products appear to have compelling cases for value, companies have not by and large made ACOs a distinct target for their commercial operations.
While cancer experts are almost giddy with enthusiasm about rapid advances in cancer immunotherapy—in a field not known for euphoria--they are equally pessimistic about market access hurdles as impediments to improved patient care and are seeking manageable approaches to assessing value.