Schering/Upsher K-Dur Settlement Does Not Violate Antitrust Law, Court Says
This article was originally published in The Pink Sheet Daily
Executive Summary
Atlanta-based federal appeals court sets aside Federal Trade Commission’s finding that a 1997 agreement between Schering-Plough and Upsher-Smith was anticompetitive. Settlement did not exceed the potential exclusionary effects of Schering’s patent on K-Dur, court says.
You may also be interested in...
Supreme Court Denies Certiorari To FTC v. Schering-Plough
The high court denies the Federal Trade Commission’s petition to hear the case regarding issues raised by brand companies’ reverse payments to generic firms.
Supreme Court Denies Certiorari To FTC v. Schering-Plough
The high court denies the Federal Trade Commission’s petition to hear the case regarding issues raised by brand companies’ reverse payments to generic firms.
FTC K-Dur Supreme Court Appeal
The U.S. Supreme Court has asked the Solicitor General to submit a brief concerning a case between Schering-Plough and the Federal Trade Commission regarding Schering's settlement with Upsher-Smith over K-Dur generics