Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

AstraZeneca Takes “Anti-Avastin” Pledge On Accelerated Approval Withdrawal

Executive Summary

Sponsor says it would offer to remove olaparib from the market if results from ongoing SOLO-2 trial in ovarian cancer maintenance setting are “not consistent” with Phase II efficacy data upon which accelerated approval is requested.

You may also be interested in...



Amylyx’s Relyvrio Withdrawal May Trigger More Public Pledges Based On Confirmatory Trial Data

Company makes good on vow at a September 2022 advisory committee meeting to withdraw the ALS drug if the PHOENIX trial failed. That pledge served as a backstop to FDA’s approval decision based on a single study and created a level of sponsor accountability that often is missing when postmarketing studies fail.

Makena Sponsor Covis Seeks To Use FDA Officials’ Words, Actions On Accelerated Approval Against CDER

Company cites comments by Oncology Center of Excellence Director Richard Pazdur and Office of Neuroscience Director Billy Dunn on reasons why confirmatory trials fail and the need for regulatory flexibility. Ironically, both senior officials have publicly extracted commitments from companies to withdraw products if postmarketing trials do not verify clinical benefit.

Amylyx’s ALS Pledge Vs. FDA’s Obscure Withdrawal Authority: Which Holds More Power?

Office of Neuroscience Director Billy Dunn touted FDA’s ability to withdraw approval for AMX0035 if subsequent data indicate a lack of substantial evidence of effectiveness. However, this provision appears to have been infrequently used and involves a potentially time-consuming hearing.

Related Content

Topics

Related Companies

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS056213

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel