PCORI Should Consider Treatment Variations, Financial Consequences In Research Prioritization – Wilensky
Project HOPE’s Gail Wilensky proposed two key parameters for prioritizing research during a recent workshop hosted by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: variations in treatment across the nation and financial consequences of treatment. Other speakers also offered advice on prioritization, while PCORI staff revealed challenges faced in the prioritization process.
You may also be interested in...
In a departure from asking researchers to propose specific research topics within broadly defined areas, the board of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute approved a plan to fund research in three targeted areas – treatment of uterine fibroids, management of asthma in African-Americans and prevention of falls in the elderly – and up to two additional areas.
The notion of patient engagement in the research process could extend so far as to include reviewing applications submitted to the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Executive Director Joseph Selby says.
Food safety programs would get the largest increase in the White House’s proposed fiscal 2015 FDA budget, and increases in user fee programs are proposed as key drivers for the boost. The agency’s overall budget would grow $335 million to $4.7 billion in the proposal.