Discussing CER Communications Asymmetry Is Putting The Cart Before The Horse – UPenn’s Caplan
Current comparative research lacks firm quality data standards, including what would be considered accurate CER. Caplan notes that in today’s research environment, standards are determined by the peer review process and have no consistent application and no regulation. Before asymmetry can be addressed, these standards need to be determined.
You may also be interested in...
What started out as an exercise to show how comparative effectiveness research could be quickly adopted and help improve health outcomes ended up revealing that there remains a long way to go.
Pharma companies’ comparative effectiveness research should be “in sync” with nationalized approach that the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute will bring, Clyde Yancy, member of the new institute’s Methodology Committee, suggests.
The credibility of comparative effectiveness research ultimately will be judged based on the methodology used to conduct the research, David Charles, associate professor and vice-chairman of neurology at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and chairman of the physician group Alliance for Patient Access, told attendees during a session at the Biotechnology Industry Organization International Convention.