Emerging Sponsors And FDA: Will Better Communication Under PDUFA V Ease Inherent Tensions?
New communication mechanisms built into the Prescription Drug User Fee Act V agreement are unlikely to be the panacea for the regulatory, economic and public relations challenges created when a small company attempts to bring its first drug to market.
You may also be interested in...
More companies are turning to CDER’s formal appeals process when presented with a review division’s regulatory decision or advice. Even though few appeals are granted in full, many sponsors get valuable clarity on a path forward; some appeals, like that for Amarin’s Vascepa SPA, are turned away at the door.
The types of FDA/sponsor interactions and timelines for meetings should not be limited by the user fee measure, industry commenters say in response to FDA’s draft guidance on expedited pathways. Some patient advocacy groups urge FDA to reconsider plans for withdrawing breakthrough designation in certain situations.
FDA’s Anti-Infective Drugs Advisory Committee endorsed Vibativ for limited use in nosocomial pneumonia. The committee was convened at the recommendation of Office of New Drugs Director John Jenkins, who denied the company’s appeal of a second “complete response” letter but urged the NDA be re-evaluated.