Avastin Decision Leaves Lingering Uncertainty As To Threshold Level Of Progression-Free Survival Benefit
Executive Summary
In her memo revoking Avastin’s metastatic breast cancer claim, FDA Commissioner Hamburg declines to adopt a “bright-line” cutoff of median PFS improvement that would be necessary to establish efficacy, despite industry’s desire for more certainty about the threshold for approval.
You may also be interested in...
The Magnitude Matters: GSK Approvals Show How To Use PFS After Other Drugs Show Survival
Submitting an NDA based on progression-free survival when other drugs for the indication have been approved on the basis of overall survival benefits is a risky proposition, but GlaxoSmithKline was confident the magnitude of Mekinist and Tafinlar’s PFS effect in metastatic melanoma would make the findings clinically relevant.
Cancer Trials Should Show Minimum 20% Overall Survival Benefit, ASCO Suggests
American Society of Clinical Oncology draft recommendations provide benchmarks for Phase III oncology drug trials, including a minimum 20% improvement in overall survival, with a higher bar for certain diseases.
Genentech Thinks Pertuzumab Will Escape Avastin Problem, Despite Similarities
Genentech is confident about a Dec. 6 BLA filing for the monoclonal antibody pertuzumab in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer with FDA, even though the application is based on a PFS benefit in a single trial.