Anatomy Of The Avandia Decision: FDA’s Woodcock Splits The Difference Between OND, OSE Views
In deciding to keep GlaxoSmithKline PLC’s Avandia on the market, while also heavily restricting its use, FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Director Janet Woodcock split the difference between opposing recommendations from the Office of New Drugs and Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology.
You may also be interested in...
Will CV Verdicts For Onglyza, Nesina Cause FDA To Change Its Tune On Antidiabetic Safety?
Large outcomes studies showed neither cardiovascular harm nor benefit with BMS/AstraZeneca’s saxagliptin or Takeda’s alogliptin, prompting some commenters to question whether FDA’s blanket approach to CV safety for all antidiabetic agents needs adjustment.
Avandia Review Endorsement Aided By Good Data, Cultural Shift On Safety
Flawed clinical trial overcomes meta-analysis safety signal as mortality data from the re-adjudicated RECORD trial persuades the rosiglitazone advisory committee that the product’s risk management program can be relaxed.
Avandia Committee Gives Split Vote To Drug, But FDA Clear Winner
A re-adjudication of cardiovascular events in the RECORD trial reassured members of a June 5-6 advisory committee that the study findings are reliable, but did not erase uncertainties about CV risk associated with rosiglitazone.