Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Gemzar "Double-Patenting" Case Has Broad Implications For Industry Pipeline

Executive Summary

Eli Lilly & Co. has the backing of the pharmaceutical and biotech industries in its effort to get an appeals court to reverse its ruling that the company’s Gemzar (gemcitabine) patent is invalid.

You may also be interested in...



Regulatory Updates, In Brief

If at first you don't succeed: The specter of legislation to end "pay-for-delay" patent settlements continues to haunt the pharmaceutical industry. Wisconsin Sen. Herb Kohl's S. 369, as reported by the Judiciary Committee in 2009, is in the financial services appropriation bill approved by the Senate Appropriations Committee July 29. The Kohl provision would bar generic companies from receiving anything of value and limiting drug development or sales in return for ending patent litigation unless the firms can prove by clear and convincing evidence that the deal will not harm competition. Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., tried to strip S. 369 from the appropriations bill, but failed on a 15-15 vote. The measure is not in the financial services appropriations bill approved by a House subcommittee July 29, but it was in the war supplemental appropriations package approved by the full House (1"The Pink Sheet," July 19, 2010). The war supplemental sent to President Obama for his signature was the Senate version, which did not contain S. 369. Further action on the financial services bills has not yet been scheduled on either side of Capitol Hill

Companies Reveal Hurdles In Providing Drugs Via Expanded Access Programs

GSK, Stealth BioTherapeutics and Blueprint Medicines discuss the difficulties getting participation of physicians, the excessive cost of expanded access, and whether physicians should report research data.

Current Pathways For Rare Disease Drugs Are Not Optimal, US FDA’s Califf Says

Anticipating a ‘tsunami of therapies’ for rare diseases, commissioner says the agency will have to think of creative approaches and employ regulatory flexibility for them. FDA considers copying the oncology center’s Project Facilitate for expanded access to other diseases.

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS052629

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel