FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance
FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials
You may also be interested in...
Tedizolid, Dalbavancin Still Face Questions On ABSSSI Lesion Measurement
Both antibiotics gain a strong positive recommendation from FDA advisory committee, but questions about how skin lesions were measured before and during treatment persist as experience with new endpoint increases.
Durata Plans To Pitch Dalbavancin As Cost-Saving Paradigm Changer
Company plans to file an NDA for the antibiotic in September, built partly on clinical work done by the drug’s previous owner, Pfizer. Given hospitals’ emphasis on cost, Durata’s marketing plan will highlight the drug’s two-dose regimen, which could help move treatment to the ambulatory-care setting.
Oritavancin Phase III Results Support FDA’s New Endpoint, Sponsor Says
FDA’s new early endpoint for efficacy in ABSSSI had been criticized at the time it was released. But reporting positive results for a second Phase III study of oritavancin, The Medicines Co. CEO says the agency’s ABSSSI endpoints are “appropriate” for industry.