Merck denys Vioxx seeding study claims
Executive Summary
Merck says its ADVANTAGE study (Assessment of Differences Between Vioxx and Naproxen to Ascertain Gastrointestinal Tolerability and Effectiveness) was not designed to fulfill a marketing objective, refuting seeding study claims made in an Aug. 19 Annals of Internal Medicine report. "ADVANTAGE was a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial with a legitimate scientific purpose designed to answer previously unanswered questions about the use of Vioxx in osteoarthritis in a primary care setting," the firm asserts in an open letter to Annals editors. However, the report cites internal documents from Merck's marketing division, including an e-mail referencing ADVANTAGE that says: "It may be a seeding study, but let's not call it that in our internal documents.