Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

FDA Should Recall Drugs Subject To GMP Violations, Rep. Dingell Suggests

Executive Summary

The House Energy & Commerce Committee is suggesting that it is not enough for FDA to send a warning letter to a company in violation of good manufacturing practices

You may also be interested in...



From nuts to drugs

When the House Energy and Commerce Oversight Subcommittee turns its attention from salmonella-contaminated peanuts and inadequacies in the FDA system for monitoring food safety, CDER and Ranbaxy executives could be the next to feel the heat. Subcommittee Chairman Bart Stupak, D-Mich., already has an ongoing investigation into why FDA failed to remove Ranbaxy products from the market after it found GMP violations at a company plant in India in 2006 (1"The Pink Sheet," July 28, 2008, p. 27). A public review of findings from that inquiry would provide further impetus for action on the FDA Globalization Act introduced by Committee Chairman Emeritus John Dingell, D-Mich., with Stupak and Health Subcommittee Chair Frank Pallone, D-N.J. Action is needed "sooner rather than later to put the agency back on track in protecting the public from unsafe food and drugs," Stupak said Feb. 12 following a recall of all products made at the Peanut Corporation of America's Plainview, Tex., plant since its opening in 2005

From nuts to drugs

When the House Energy and Commerce Oversight Subcommittee turns its attention from salmonella-contaminated peanuts and inadequacies in the FDA system for monitoring food safety, CDER and Ranbaxy executives could be the next to feel the heat. Subcommittee Chairman Bart Stupak, D-Mich., already has an ongoing investigation into why FDA failed to remove Ranbaxy products from the market after it found GMP violations at a company plant in India in 2006 (1"The Pink Sheet," July 28, 2008, p. 27). A public review of findings from that inquiry would provide further impetus for action on the FDA Globalization Act introduced by Committee Chairman Emeritus John Dingell, D-Mich., with Stupak and Health Subcommittee Chair Frank Pallone, D-N.J. Action is needed "sooner rather than later to put the agency back on track in protecting the public from unsafe food and drugs," Stupak said Feb. 12 following a recall of all products made at the Peanut Corporation of America's Plainview, Tex., plant since its opening in 2005

Reps. Dingell, Stupak expand FDA inspection inquiry

With the expansion of the Energy and Commerce Committee's two-year inquiry into FDA's alleged manufacturer inspection failures, pharma can assume that any GMP violations will lead to questions of their core bioequivalence verification methods. Rep. John Dingell and fellow Michigan Democrat Rep. Bart Stupak sent a letter to Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach Oct. 8 regarding Actavis Totowa's Aug. 1 recall of all drugs manufactured at the Little Falls, N.J. plant (1"The Pink Sheet," Aug. 11, 2008, p. 24). The letter requests a number of FDA documents, including a list of laboratories performing BE studies for Actavis products and FDA personnel responsible for inspecting those labs. The inquiry comes on the heels of an ongoing investigation into allegations of fraud related to Ranbaxy bioequivalence and stability data in its ANDAs (2"The Pink Sheet," July 28, 2008, p. 27)

Related Content

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS049914

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel