Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Will third time be a charm for Medicare bill?

Executive Summary

The Senate is poised to take a third shot at passing legislation that would reverse Medicare physician payment cuts that went into effect July 1 and contains a number of drug-related provisions. In a June 30 letter to HHS Secretary Michael Leavitt, Sens. John Rockefeller, D-W.V., and Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., wrote, the administration can help doctors in Medicare by letting Senate Republicans "vote for passage of H.R. 6331 when it comes up again for a vote after the July recess." The bill began as S. 3101 in the Senate and includes an electronic prescribing incentive program, bundled payments for dialysis and a number of Part D prescription drug plan provisions. After failing in the Senate June 12, the House on June 24 passed a modified version, as H.R. 6331, with a veto-proof majority. The modified bill failed to pass the Senate two days later (1"The Pink Sheet," June 30, 2008, p. 23)

You may also be interested in...



Medicare Bill Strikes Out Again In Senate After Home Run In House

Momentum from a surprising House passage of a slightly modified version of the Sen. Max Baucus-penned Medicare physician payment legislation was not quite enough to carry the bill on a second try in the Senate on June 26

US FDA Expects Joint AdComm Briefing Document, Oncology Chief Says

The combined format is the new default for briefing advisory committee members, US FDA Oncology Center of Excellence Director Pazdur declared.

Parallel Scientific Advice: Is The EMA User Fee Impacting Interest?

EMA charges participants to receive scientific advice through the fledgling program, unlike the US FDA, which may not fit the budgets of some complex generic sponsors. At the same time, sponsors also may simply not be aware the program exists yet.

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS049849

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel