Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

FDA Budget Needs To Double Over Next Five Years, Science Board Says

Executive Summary

The FDA Science Board has recommended a $375 million increase over fiscal 2008 in direct appropriations to FDA for 2009, and larger increases in each of the following five federal budgets

You may also be interested in...



FDA could use more appropriations

FDA could absorb an additional $100 million in funding over that proposed by the Bush Administration for fiscal 2009, but not the full $375 million recommended by the FDA Science Board, Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach tells the Senate Appropriations Committee at an April 15 hearing. "We could absorb the $100 million that you referred to, and do that quite rapidly and quite effectively," he told the panel. "As we would get closer and closer to the [$375 million] ... it would require greater stewardship to be sure we could implement those dollars as rapidly and effectively as we need to," he said. The administration's proposal provides a $51 million increase over 2008 in direct appropriations to FDA, bringing federal funding to $1.77 billion in FY 2009 (1"The Pink Sheet," Feb. 11, 2008, p. 4). "It may be our responsibility to fix OMB's mistake here. And you probably have more friends here than you might have at other places in town," Sen. Robert Bennett, R-Utah., told the commissioner. An amendment sponsored by Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., would increase FDA appropriations according to the Science Board's recommendations for a $375 million increase over fiscal 2008 in direct appropriations to FDA for 2009, and larger increases in each of the following five years (2"The Pink Sheet," March 3, 2008, p. 9)

FDA could use more appropriations

FDA could absorb an additional $100 million in funding over that proposed by the Bush Administration for fiscal 2009, but not the full $375 million recommended by the FDA Science Board, Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach tells the Senate Appropriations Committee at an April 15 hearing. "We could absorb the $100 million that you referred to, and do that quite rapidly and quite effectively," he told the panel. "As we would get closer and closer to the [$375 million] ... it would require greater stewardship to be sure we could implement those dollars as rapidly and effectively as we need to," he said. The administration's proposal provides a $51 million increase over 2008 in direct appropriations to FDA, bringing federal funding to $1.77 billion in FY 2009 (1"The Pink Sheet," Feb. 11, 2008, p. 4). "It may be our responsibility to fix OMB's mistake here. And you probably have more friends here than you might have at other places in town," Sen. Robert Bennett, R-Utah., told the commissioner. An amendment sponsored by Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., would increase FDA appropriations according to the Science Board's recommendations for a $375 million increase over fiscal 2008 in direct appropriations to FDA for 2009, and larger increases in each of the following five years (2"The Pink Sheet," March 3, 2008, p. 9)

Sen. Kennedy Acts On FDA Science Board Funding Recommendation

Federal budget allotments for fiscal 2009 would include a carve-out to increase FDA's budget by the amount recommended by the agency's Science Board, thanks to an amendment sponsored by Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass

Related Content

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

LL1133546

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel