Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

FEDERAL VACCINE PURCHASE WILL COVER 3 MIL. MORE CHILDREN

Executive Summary

FEDERAL VACCINE PURCHASE WILL COVER 3 MIL. MORE CHILDREN under the age of six in addition to the 6.5 mil. currently on Medicaid, Sen. Riegle (D-Mich.) told a Dec. 6 meeting of Immunization Partnership, a joint project of the American Nurses Association and Every Child By Two. The expansion of coverage to those children without insurance and those whose insurance does not cover vaccines, as well as the Medicaid population, represents "a vital breakthrough," Riegle said, and the first step toward ensuring that "all preschoolers are properly immunized at the appropriate time." Furthermore, Riegle maintained that, by offering states the option to use their own funds to purchase additional quantities of vaccine at federal discount prices, the federal purchasing program will "enable limited state funds to reach more children at risk." The Vaccines for Children Program, which was passed by Congress in August and signed into law as part of the 1993 budget act, directs the federal government to purchase vaccines from manufacturers at a negotiated consolidated purchase price and provide them, through states, to all public and private health care providers for administration to Medicaid-eligible children, Native Americans, and children who do not have health insurance ("The Pink Sheet" Aug. 9, p. 6). In addition, insured children without immunization benefits may receive free vaccines at certain federal health clinics. The federal purchasing program is targeted in large part at children in low-income families, who have significantly lower immunization rates. However, National Vaccine Program Office Director Walter Orenstein, MD, noted, "the bulk of the immunization problem is still in the majority community," among families that are at or above the poverty level and among white children. Orenstein provided 1991 statistics on the breakdown of immunization rates both by income and race. Children in families at or above the poverty level had an 87% immunization rate for measles, Orenstein said, 76% for three doses of DTP, and 49% for three doses of polio. This compares to rates of 73%, 53% and 39%, respectively, for children below poverty. White children had rates of 83% for measles, 73% for DTP and 57% for polio. The rates for African American children were 77%, 51% and 36%, while the rates for children falling in the "other" category were 84%, 58% and 50%. Nevertheless, Orenstein pointed out, white children represent 67% of those who have received fewer than three doses of DTP, 63% of those with fewer than three doses of oral polio vaccine, and 75% of children who have never received a measles shot. Children in families at or above the poverty line make up 67% of those in need of DTP vaccine, 72% needing polio and 67% needing measles. Underimmunized children are also distributed fairly evenly among urban, rural and suburban areas, Orenstein said. The companion provisions to the Vaccines for Children Program that provide for outreach, tracking and the creation of immunization registries were placed in separate legislation that cleared the Senate Nov. 4 ("The Pink Sheet" Nov. 8, In Brief). Riegle declared that "we must now commit ourselves to aggressively work with the members of the House to achieve final enactment of this critical legislation next year." In anticipation of the start of the program, the Public Health Service reports that "arrangements for distribution are presently being developed, in consultation with states and manufacturers." The purchasing program is scheduled to begin Oct. 1, 1994, at a net cost to the federal government, including savings from eliminating Medicaid purchases, of $585 mil. from FY 1995 to 1998. Total federal vaccine purchases over those four years are estimated at $1.39 bil. Initial discussions between HHS and the vaccine manufacturers have brought to light a potential problem in implementing the legislative instructions with regard to vaccine delivery. The bill states that the prices negotiated by HHS will include delivery costs, and stipulates that if a state program does not provide direct delivery of pediatric vaccines to health care providers, "the vaccine manufacturer involved agrees...to provide for the delivery of the vaccines on behalf of the state in accordance with such program and will not impose any charges for the costs of such delivery (except to the extent such costs are provided for in the price established: through HHS negotiations. For vaccines that are already on the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention's discount list, however, the negotiated price cannot exceed the price as of May 1993, updated by the Consumer Price Index. The contracts that vaccine manufacturers have with governments now include the price of the vaccine as well as the cost of distribution to a centralized point, or, if the contract involves distribution to individual providers, an additional delivery and shipping charge on each vaccine.

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS023752

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel