Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

J&J TRAMADOL U.S. CHRONIC PAIN DATABASE OF 1,000 PATIENTS

Executive Summary

J&J TRAMADOL U.S. CHRONIC PAIN DATABASE OF 1,000 PATIENTS in three large Phase III trials of up to 24 months treatment will be submitted to FDA as part of the firm's NDA for both chronic and acute pain. Johnson & Johnson's R. W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute is currently "in the throes" of preparing the NDA, the firm said. U.S. clinical trials for acute pain comprising single and multiple dose trials include about 4,500 patients. U.S. trials were completed about a year ago. A name J&J trademarked for tramadol is Ultram. The oral analgesic, licensed to J&J in the U.S. from the German firm Gruenenthal in 1986, was launched in Germany in 1977 for acute and chronic pain and is currently marketed in 40 countries. Over 11.7 mil. patients have been treated with the drug, an exposure of over approximately 400 mil. doses, J&J estimated. The efficacy of tramadol is "really not at the morphine level," but J&J believes it is similar to that of weak opioid/NSAID combinations such as propoxyphene and acetaminophen (Darvocet and generics), R. W. Johnson principal scientist Robert Raffa, PhD, told a May 6 meeting in Philadelphia entitled "Advances in the Treatment of Chronic Pain." In "most of these clinical trials, tramadol in a dose-related fashion seems to be at about that level," Raffa explained. J&J is hoping to claim that tramadol has fewer side effects than other opioid analgesics, based in part on a preclinical study by R. W. Johnson and Gruenenthal suggesting that the drug, a racemic mixture, has an opioid and a non-opioid component to its analgesic action. Raffa's abstract asserts that unlike "typical opioid analgesics," tramadol use "is not associated with significant respiratory depression, sedation or other common side effects, nor are there signs of tolerance, dependence or euphoric effects." Gruenenthal originally launched and marketed the drug as an opiate. J&J's "working hypothesis," Raffa told the Cambridge Healthtech Institute-sponsored meeting, is that "the opioid component is predominantly [the] mu [receptor]...while the nonopioid component probably involves norepinephrine and serotonin uptake inhibition or release." Addressing the issue of dependence, Raffa noted that Gruenenthal has received about 17 to 20 reports a year of abuse problems with tramadol, a level that has remained steady while sales of tramadol have increased. The drug is not regulated as a controlled substance in any country where it is marketed, J&J noted. To support the claims of lower rates of respiratory depression and constipation for tramadol as compared to typical opioids, Raffa said preclinical data "do support the lack of side effects." The major side effects of tramadol are nausea and vomiting, other events associated with opioid analgesics. National Institute of Dental Research Neurobiology and Anesthesiology Branch Clinical Trials Unit Chief Mitchell Max, MD, challenged Raffa's statements about adverse events, saying that he had not seen enough clinical data to support it. "I hope that you did do the studies...to show [the favorable side-effect profile]...because I think there are going to be a lot of rooters for tramadol" if the drug does have the favorable side- effect profile.

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS022615

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel