Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

DUR PROSPECTIVE SCREENING INITIALLY WILL BE MANUAL IN MOST STATES, OREGON OFFICIAL TELLS NARD; STATES "SCRAMBLING" TO IMPLEMENT DUR IN JAN. 1993

Executive Summary

Prospective drug utilization review (DUR) screening in most states will have to be conducted manually when the OBRA 1990 DUR requirements become effective Jan. 1, 1993, Oregon Pharmacy Programs Manager Lisa Huntsinger told NARD annual meeting attendees in Seattle on Oct. 28. Huntsinger, who implemented Oregon's retrospective DUR program in 1989 and will be responsible for making sure the state meets the new federal DUR requirements, noted that while "more and more" states are moving to "a paperless claims approach, many states are going to have to start out manually." She predicted that "most states" will eventually move "toward an electronic [claims and DUR] process where they can actually provide to [pharmacists] information on a state-wide basis." The Health Care Financing Administration was scheduled to publish the OBRA 1990 DUR regulations in the Nov. 2 Federal Register (see preceding story). Huntsinger said that "right now states are scrambling to implement" DUR. Asked whether state Medicaid programs will be required to provide electronic adjudication to monitor over-utilization, Huntsinger noted that the federal government currently does not require states to have electronic claims processing but does provide incentives for states to move toward electronic claims systems. "There are incentives under OBRA 1990 of 90% matched funds for states to put in electronic programs just dealing with adjudicating [pharmacist] claims -- not even including [drug utilization] screening," she observed. "Even so, because of limitations related to technology [and] time limitations, there are a lot of states that currently aren't taking advantage of" the federal incentives, Huntsinger said, "but states are now working towards that." She predicted "some states" will be ready for electronic claims processing in a "few months" while "other states...are looking at 10 years down the road." Oregon is preparing for the possibility that the federal government will take severe measures to enforce its new DUR requirements, Huntsinger indicated. "Some argue that [HCFA] would never take away the federal funding because that would kill the Medicaid program," she said; however, "there is nothing to stop the federal government from just wounding a state by sanctioning for several days for not meeting compliance." Huntsinger noted that HCFA already has audited Oregon's Medicaid drug price rebate program. The prospective DUR requirements will put a "heavy burden" on pharmacists to extract information from patients in states that have not yet adopted an electronic DUR system, Huntsinger said. She pointed out that the federal prospective DUR screening requirements include therapeutic duplication, drug-disease contraindications, drug-drug interactions, incorrect dosage or duration, drug-allergy interactions and clinical misuse/abuse. "Oftentimes you are going to run into patients...who may not know exactly what their diagnoses are or who may not consider aspirin a drug," she predicted. "Under the requirements of drug- drug interactions come those OTC products, so you are going to have to do a lot more interaction than maybe what you are used to doing," she cautioned the independent pharmacy group. Under the law, pharmacists will have to make a "reasonable effort" to comply with the patient screening requirement, Huntsinger said, suggesting that pharmacists should err on the side of caution in defining "reasonable effort." She said she knows of no state that has defined the term. However, she noted, the regs will allow pharmacists to delegate to staff the offer to counsel patients and to take patient screening information, although the pharmacist will retain final responsibility. In addition, Huntsinger reported that mail-order pharmacies and those pharmacies that provide deliveries will have to make a toll-free telephone line available to Medicaid beneficiaries under the patient counseling requirements. Whether prescription refills will fall under the patient counseling requirements is being left up to the states by HCFA, she noted. Based on the DUR legislation currently active in the states, she said that the states are split on whether they will require patient counseling for refills.

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS021697

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel