Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

DRUGS TESTED IN CHILDREN WOULD GET SIX MONTHS' EXCLUSIVITY UNDER KASSEBAUM BILL

Executive Summary

Prescription drugs with "FDA approved" trials conducted on pediatric populations would receive six months' exclusivity under legislation introduced Oct. 5 by Sen. Kassebaum (R-Kansas). The bill (S 3337) adds six months of additional protection from generic competition for products in which pediatric studies were conducted before approval or after marketing and at the request of FDA. According to a summary of the legislation, the exclusivity period would start "on the earliest date on which an approval of the application for a generic copy of the drug could otherwise be made effective." The bill provides "six months' exclusivity for products for which FDA-approved pediatric studies are conducted," Kassebaum said in her statement on the Senate floor. "A drug qualifying for this exclusivity would not be subject to new generic competition for six months after the expiration of its patent or other exclusivity under current law." Eligible products are those "not ordinarily studied in children," Kassebaum explained. Therefore, the bill excludes antibiotic, anti-asthmatic and anti-allergy medication and drugs for "conditions that occur only in children." Noting that pediatric testing currently "is performed only haphazardly," Kassebaum said her bill "creates incentives for drug manufacturers to test the impact of drug products in pediatric populations." She noted that the proposed incentive is modeled on the exclusivity provisions of the 1983 Orphan Drug Act and the 1984 ANDA/patent law. Because "pharmaceutical products are seldom studied in younger populations," Kassebaum said, "physicians who wish to use these drugs for pediatric patients are forced to estimate pediatric dosages from the dosages found to be safe and effective in adults." She pointed out that "such estimates are sometimes uncertain" because children "frequently metabolize drugs differently than do adults." FDA has promoted geriatric testing and labeling without the use of legislative exclusivity incentives. The agency also has proposed to base pediatric indications on study data from adults (see preceding story). The Kansas senator noted that she has worked with the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and FDA in drafting the bill. She explained that the bill was introduced in the waning hours of the 102nd Congress to elicit comments over the next few months so that they can be accommodated in a new bill "when the new Congress convenes" and the proposal can be considered "expeditiously."

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS021624

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel