Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

LEMMON’s CLEMASTINE FUMARATE IS FIRST GENERIC

Executive Summary

LEMMON's CLEMASTINE FUMARATE IS FIRST GENERIC form of Sandoz' prescription antihistamine products Tavist-1 (1.34 mg tabs) and Tavist (2.68 mg tabs) approved by FDA. Clemastine, approved on Jan. 31, is Lemmon's second ANDA to be cleared by FDA within the last few weeks. The company received the first generic approval of the topical antibiotic fluocinonide ointment (Syntex' Lidex) on Dec. 27. Lemmon's most recent ANDA approval before fluocinonide and clemastine was "nearly two years" ago, the firm's parent corporation, Teva Pharmaceutical, noted in a Feb. 3 press release. Lemmon's two-year wait for ANDA approvals must have been particularly trying for a company that has made bold predictions about its pipeline. In November 1990, in the midst of the generic drug scandal, Lemmon parent Teva told a meeting of securities analysts in New York that it anticipated receiving approval of generic sucralfate, having filed an ANDA for sucralfate in 1989 and undergone a preapproval inspection during the summer of 1990. Sandoz' Tavist line accounted for an estimated $115 mil. in sales in 1990. However, the long-acting antihistamine/decongestant combination Tavist-D (clemastine/phenylpropanolamine) alone accounted for about $75 mil. of the total sales of the line. The February 1992 issue of American Druggist ranks Tavist-D as the 76th most frequently dispensed prescription drug in 1991. The Tavist-D patent is due to expire on Jan. 20, 1993. Sandoz' clemastine patent expired July 9, 1980. The appearance of a generic clemastine may increase pressure on Sandoz to transfer Tavist-D to OTC status to head off further erosion of the line's sales. The firm told securities analysts last year that it is planning an Rx-to-OTC switch for the combination product ("The Pink Sheet" Dec. 23, p. 5). Introduction of multiple brands of nonsedating antihistamines -- particularly those combined with decongestant ingredients, like Marion Merrell Dow's Seldane-D -- already have eaten into the Tavist-D market. MMD told analysts late last year that Seldane-D required only six weeks of U.S. marketing to surpass Tavist-D as the leading prescription allergy product ("The Pink Sheet" Dec. 9, p. 13). FDA denied an Rx-to-OTC switch for Tavist-1 in 1985 due to an unsubstantiated low drowsiness claim. The agency required Sandoz to submit comparative data on drowsiness associated with antihistamines before permitting a low drowsiness claim for Tavist-1. The situation was exacerbated in 1987 when FDA and Capitol Hill objected to a full-page open letter from Sandoz to prescribers that was published in newspapers and described Tavist- 1's "low drowsiness."

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

ID1135947

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel