Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

DUR SHOULD EXAMINE COST ISSUES "ONLY AFTER CLINICAL AND PATIENT

Executive Summary

DUR SHOULD EXAMINE COST ISSUES "ONLY AFTER CLINICAL AND PATIENT considerations are addressed," under a policy statement adopted by AMA on June 25 in Chicago. Proposed by the American Medical Association's board and approved by the House of Delegates, the "Principles of Drug Utilization Review" further states that the "primary emphasis" of DUR "must be to enhance quality of care for patients by assuring appropriate drug therapy," and "sufficient professional prerogatives should exist for individualized drug therapy." The document also addresses physician intervention strategies and retrospective DUR methods. DUR program "interventions must focus on improving therapeutic outcomes," AMA said, advising that "focused education to change professional or patient behavior should be the primary intervention strategy." In addition, all retrospective DUR reports "should be subjected to subsequent review by a committee of peers prior to intervention." Regarding online prospective DUR, the document maintains that services should be denied "only in cases of patient ineligibility, coverage limitations, or obvious fraud. In other instances, decisions regarding appropriate drug therapy should remain the prerogative of practitioners." The document notes that the principles "are intended to reflect the common views shared by the major professional associations of medicine and pharmacy on DUR." The American Pharmaceutical Association's Board of Trustees endorsed the principles June 12. AMA's delegates had discussed DUR issues at their December 1990 meeting in Orlando, Fla. The effort to develop a joint physician/pharmacy statement grew out of a meeting in Chicago earlier this year between AMA Exec VP James Todd, MD, and APhA Exec VP John Gans to identify common areas of concern. Regarding criteria and standards for DUR, the principles state that such tools should be developed by evaluating such resources as peer-reviewed literature and compendia, consensus-derived clinical guidelines developed by professional groups, experience of practitioners expert in drug therapy, information supplied by manufacturers, and experience obtained from DUR operations. Criteria should be "validated prior to use" and should "identify underutilization, as well as overutilization, and inappropriate utilization," the document advises. In addition, any criteria and standards "must be nonproprietary and must be developed and revised through an open professional consensus process." The document also indicates concern that DUR programs implement adequate safeguards for the security of databases and patient confidentiality. The document also maintains that any nationally-set review criteria for drug utilization should allow for "appropriate modification" at the state level. The delegates also asked AMA's board to examine reported use by claims processors of physician Drug Enforcement Administration numbers to collect prescribing information on individual physicians. A resolution that had been proposed by Missouri delegates contends that "pharmacists have begun to supply physician DEA numbers to unauthorized parties," and some claims processors have "begun to market physician prescribing profiles based on prescription information derived from computer data sorted by DEA number."

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS019415

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel