Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

FDA GENERIC/ENFORCEMENT HEARING RESCHEDULED FOR JULY 11

Executive Summary

FDA GENERIC/ENFORCEMENT HEARING RESCHEDULED FOR JULY 11 by the House Energy & Commerce/Oversight Subcommittee, Chairman Dingell (D-Mich.) informed Commissioner Kessler in a May 2 letter requesting the agency chief's appearance. HHS General Counsel Michael Astrue and HHS Inspector General Richard Kusserow also are being asked to testify at the hearing, which was postponed from May 1. Dingell also is scheduling hearings for June 5 and June 27. The first hearing will focus on delays in ANDA approvals, the congressman wrote, asking that Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Director Carl Peck, MD, Deputy Director Gerald Meyer and Office of Generic Drugs Director Roger Williams, MD, testify. The hearing will review "the inordinate delays in the generic drug approval process" and will particularly address "the policies and management of" CDER and the generic drugs office. "Much of that hearing will focus on the findings and recommendations of" the FDA panel on alleged agency retaliation against generic industry whistleblowers (see following T&G). The hearing tentatively scheduled for June 27 will review "enforcement problems" found in FDA's San Juan, Newark, and Denver district offices, Dingell said. The Oversight Subcommittee held a hearing March 7 on FDA headquarters' failure to take regulatory actions recommended by Chicago district inspectors ("The Pink Sheet" March 11, p. 7). Dingell's request for documents in preparation for the hearing indicate the nature of the problems to be discussed. He asked for documents from agency headquarters "relating to enforcement actions or the rejection of enforcement actions (from 1985- present) for Biocraft, Zenith, Vitarine, and Pharmaceutical Basics, Inc. (Denver)." The letter asks for similar documents relating to three device firms. An Inspector General report of findings from the Denver and Orlando FDA districts indicates that inspectors in those districts missed discovering serious problems, such as fraud. Firms located in the Denver district that may be cited during the hearing include Cell Technology and Cord Labs, as well as PBI. Four products made by PBI were found to be subject of ANDAs with "discrepancies," according to the report: desipramine, metaproterenol 10 and 20 mg, and amiloride.

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS019111

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel