Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

REP. DINGELL HEARING ON FDA-INDUSTRY RELATIONS POSTPONED

Executive Summary

REP. DINGELL HEARING ON FDA-INDUSTRY RELATIONS POSTPONED to Dec. 20 from Dec. 11. Planned witnesses include a Barr Labs executive and FDA official Robert Navazio. House Energy & Commerce/Oversight Subcommittee Chairman Dingell (D-Mich.) reportedly wants to obtain testimony to challenge statements made by former FDA Deputy Commissioner John Norris under oath at a previous hearing. Norris testified Oct. 15 about an advisory document he had prepared for Barr in his current capacity as executive VP of the public relations firm Hill & Knowlton ("The Pink Sheet" Oct. 22, p. 9). The former FDAer indicated that the document was not a proposal to establish an ongoing relationship between Hill & Knowlton and Barr to improve the manufacturer's relations with FDA. Barr is expected to be asked its views as to whether Norris Navazio was cited by Norris as a former colleague who had confided that "several" FDA high-ranking officials believed Barr's relations with the agency were counterproductive. Navazio, who was executive secretariat when Norris was deputy commissioner, is expected to have a different recollection of any conversations with Norris. In a letter to Barr, Norris said that "bad relations" between ANDA sponsors and FDA "guarantee delays" in approvals. The letter was released at the hearing, and Rep. Wyden (D-Ore.) commented that the subcommittee was "very concerned" that a former FDA official would suggest that the agency "punishes firms" through regulatory decisions due to poor relationships with the agency. Dingell's hearing to update the Justice Department's investigation of the generic drug industry appears on target for Dec. 19 ("The Pink Sheet" Dec. 3, p. 9). The update will feature two lead prosecutors in the case: U.S. Attorney for Baltimore Breckinridge Willcox and Assistant U.S. Attorney Gary Jordan. The investigation is expected to produce several new indictments. Subcommittee staff has said "generic companies under active criminal investigation to date represent fully half of the production" of all post-1962 generic drugs excluding antibiotics. The hearing also will include a panel of three FDA enforcement officials: Compliance Office Director Daniel Michels, Manufacturing & Product Quality Division Director Edmund Fry and Compliance Office staff member Paul Vogel.

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS018496

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel