Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE MANUFACTURING FACILITY TO BE REINSPECTED

Executive Summary

HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE MANUFACTURING FACILITY TO BE REINSPECTED by FDA within the next two months. The firm said that FDA is moving ahead with plans to reinspect the facility following three agency inspections of the plant earlier this year, in January, April and June. FDA sent Roche a regulatory letter Sept. 5 citing eight different observations made during a January 18 through March 22, 1990 inspection. The reg letter mentions problems that may have lead to the February recall of Roche's antimalarial drug Lariam (mefloquine HCl) ("The Pink Sheet" April 9, T&G-17). A packaging defect resulted in some unit dose blisters containing two tablets instead of one tablet. Roche responded in April and May to the FD-483 issued following the January-March inspection. Roche also responded to the reg letter in mid-September. Roche said that FDA was "satisfied" with the corrective actions taken by the firm and that the company was taken by surprise by the reg letter since Roche felt it had responded to the observations in the FD-483. In the reg letter, FDA stated that "equipment qualification was not performed in that there had not been an evaluation of the capability of the foil pouch packaging equipment to consistently package one Lariam tablet in a unit dose pouch." The agency added that "there is no written procedure requiring that the...equipment is to be evaluated for appropriate design prior to use on new dosage forms or different size dosage forms." The letter notes that "the product was packaged on equipment that had no set-up specifications for the Lariam tablet size." The reg letter also refers to an Accutane (isotretinoin) label mixup complaint and the company's response to it. The agency noted that Roche did not document the destruction of rejected and unused capsules from the lot involved in the complaint. "The capsules were reported to have been destroyed but there is no record of the method, the date or the individual(s) witnessing the destruction." Roche said that the mixup involved only one sheet of capsules of a different dosage from the rest of the lot. Upon investigation, it was determined that the mixup did not occur at the plant, but possibly could have occurred at the wholesale level, the firm said. Roche added that the mixup did not result in a recall. FDA also criticized Roche for not giving its quality control unit sufficient responsibility for approving or rejecting certain procedures and specifications. "The written procedures for the quality control unit do not provide for review and approval of master production and control records for packaging and labeling," the letter states. Also the quality control group "does not review or approve batch production and control records to determine compliance with all established procedures prior to release and distribution." The agency also found Roche's annual evaluations of the quality standards for drug products to be inadequate. Noting that the annual review "lists a total of 14 complaints," the agency remarked that "not mentioned are an additional 548 ADE [adverse drug experience] complaints which were received by your firm during this period." In addition, Roche's written procedures for producing the annual product review are lacking in that they "do not require the inclusion of a review of [ADE] complaints which may indicate the failure of the drug product to meet its specifications," FDA said. The letter notes that the company's procedures "do not require the inclusion of a review of discrepancy investigations" and "do not require the inclusion of a review of returned drug product."

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS143249

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel