Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

SCHERING LABS RECALL OF TRILAFON CONCENTRATE WAS NOT REPORTED

Executive Summary

SCHERING LABS RECALL OF TRILAFON CONCENTRATE WAS NOT REPORTED to FDA, the agency maintained in a regulatory letter issued to the firm Aug. 23. The reg letter cites several adverse GMP findings from an inspection, completed in May, of the firm's Kenilworth, N.J. plant. The inspection was initiated in April when FDA learned of the Schering product removal action from an outside source. The FDA investigators reported confirming that Schering had "recalled" all lots of Trilafon (perphenazine) Concentrate in early April "because of instability and failure to comply with specifications prior to the five-year expiration data" without "procedures for agency notification." The regulatory letter also pointed to the April-May inspection findings that Schering had not reported a dissolution problem found in a lot of Proventil Repetabs. The FDA findings led to Schering's recall of the Proventil (albuterol) lot in July [EDITOR's NOTE: The recall is listed in the Sept. 5 "Enforcement Report" in this issue of "The Pink Sheet," T&G-14]. The FDA inspection team reported that Schering's procedures had allowed for the release of three pans of the Proventil batch even though a fourth pan from the batch, "coated at the same time, by the same person with the same solution" had been found to fail dissolution. FDA also asserted in the regulatory letter that Schering's records of problem investigations, including the Trilafon and Proventil cases, were not adequate. For instance, the FDA-483 adverse findings report on the April-May inspection states that Schering's report of the investigation into the Trilafon instability problem "was incomplete and failed to address sulfoxide release specifications, oxygen content, and other degradation products." Other inspection findings cited in the August 23 regulatory letter included lack of environmental and/or microbiological control over manufacturing areas for bulk drug substances and lack of validation of cleaning procedures in these areas. FDA also pointed out in the letter that Schering had released a batch of Vancenase (beclomethasone) Inhalers containing mold contamination. FDA acknowledged in the letter that Schering has "initiated steps to correct the deficiencies cited." The firm, in turn, noted that a detailed response to the regulatory letter was submitted to FDA during the week of Sept. 3, and it anticipates that "all" related issues will be resolved "within a short period of time."

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS018044

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel