Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

MILES ONE-A-DAY HEALTH PROTECTION CLAIMS ARE "MISLEADING"

Executive Summary

MILES ONE-A-DAY HEALTH PROTECTION CLAIMS ARE "MISLEADING," the New York State Attorney General's Office asserted in an Aug. 29 statement announcing a settlement agreement with Miles on ad claims for the multiple vitamins. Under the "assurance of discontinuance" order, Miles agreed to stop advertising that One- A-Day multiple vitamins are "necessary or effective in preventing or reversing the health effects of air pollution, ordinary stress or routine exercise," the Attorney General's Office said. The settlement agreement concerns claims made in a One-A-Day TV and radio ad campaign that ran from August 1989 until April. The ads claimed: "Defending your lungs against air pollution requires vitamins A, C and E. Daily stress can chip away at your B vitamins. And rigorous physical training can lower your body's supply of essential minerals. That's why One-A-Day vitamins are uniquely formulated to put back what your world takes away." The order against Miles alleges that the ads "misrepresented directly and by implication" that: "the average consumer needs a vitamin supplement to prevent damage to the lungs and to prevent mineral and vitamin loss" and "damage to the lungs caused by the effects of air pollution can be prevented or...reversed by the addition of One-A-Day vitamins"; and that "a balanced diet does not have sufficient amounts of vitamins A, E and C to play a protective role against damage to the lungs caused by air pollution." The order further alleges that Miles' ad claims suggested to the average consumer that: "a balanced diet alone will not prevent excess mineral loss when exercising"; "routine physical exercise results in the elimination of essential minerals from the body"; and "routine types of daily stress can deplete B vitamins." The agreement with Miles requires the firm for a period of three years beginning July 31 to "cease and desist from making any representation directly or by implication" that "the average consumer loses B vitamins or minerals due to ordinary daily stress or physical exercise, and that One-A-Day vitamins can prevent or mitigate damage to the lungs resulting from air pollution," a New York State Attorney General's Office press release states. In addition to New York, the attorneys general of Texas and California were involved in an investigation of the One-A-Day claims. Robert Abrams, Jim Mattox and John Van DeKamp, respectively, have been very active of late in investigating health claims for food and nutritional products, particularly since the flood of cholesterol-lowering claims hit the market for oat bran products and psyllium-containing cereals. Miles, which signed the agreement without admitting any wrongdoing, said it believes the ads "were not misleading and the claims were well substantiated." The ads were taken off the air, the company said, when a decision was made to pursue a new marketing direction. In addition to signing the consent order, Miles agreed to pay $10,000 to each of the three states to cover the costs of the investigation. The company is also working to resolve the matter of appropriate One-A-Day claims with the Federal Trade Commission.

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS018010

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel