Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

PAR BUYS OUT THREE QUAD SENIOR MANAGERS, CLEANS SLATE

Executive Summary

PAR BUYS OUT THREE QUAD SENIOR MANAGERS, CLEANS SLATE of lingering ownership issues and permits Par's new management to deal with the unfolding regulatory questions related to the generic drug scandal. Under an agreement in principle announced April 12, Par will purchase 40% of the equity in its Quad subsidiary from three managers. The company noted that "Quad's senior management, who are currently on leaves of absence from their duties, would resign upon consummation of the transaction." The deal is pending "the finalization and execution of definitive agreements and approval of the transaction by Par's and Quad's Boards of Directors," an April 12 press release says. The 40% stake in Quad is equally divided between the firm's three top execs: Senior VP-Secretary Raja Feroz, Senior VP-treasurer Dulal Chatterji, and Exec VP Asrar Burney. The three execs had previously purchased the 10% stake in the firm owned by Quad's former President and CEO Dilip Shah, who sold his interest in the company before tendering his resignation. In September, Shah was sentenced to two years probation, 60 days of work release and one year of community service, and fined $250,000 for paying $32,000 in illegal gratuities to FDA generic drug reviewers ("The Pink Sheet" Sept. 18, 1989, p. 2). Burney had served as Quad's acting president while Shah took a leave of absence prior to his resignation. Other problems have arisen at Quad. Par recently reported that 15 injectable drug entities manufactured by the subsidiary did "not conform fully to the terms of their approved ANDAs." Quad recalled 93 lots of 22 drug products in late March ("The Pink Sheet," April 2, T&G-14). In early 1985, Par acquired 80% of the injectables manufacturer, then called BetaMed. The remaining 20% was purchased in the latter part of 1986. In total, Par paid $2 mil. for BetaMed. Difficulties over ownership rights apparently developed over continued equity participation by the BetaMed execs. An August 1986 prospectus on the Par/BetaMed merger notes, that after the merger, "four key employees of BetaMed will receive an equity interest in the surviving corporation." Subsequent to a complaint filed by the four execs, Par transferred 40% of its interest in Quad to the four subsidiary employees in December 1988, Par's 1988 annual report says. In December 1987, the execs sought a declaration that Par had breeched the agreement, and asked for a judgment for damages allegedly caused by Par's failure to transfer the stock in November 1986. The parties reached a settlement, which involved placing certain restrictions on the shares of Quad.

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS017280

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel