Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

ADRIA IDARUBICIN APPEARS AS EFFECTIVE AS WYETH-AYERST’s DAUNORUBICIN

Executive Summary

ADRIA IDARUBICIN APPEARS AS EFFECTIVE AS WYETH-AYERST's DAUNORUBICIN (Cerubidine) in treating acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL), FDA's Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee concluded at its Feb. 2 meeting. "Studies suggest strongly that idarubicin is at least as effective as daunorubicin and probably should be approved," said committee member Teresa Vietti, MD, Pediatric Oncology Group, St. Louis, Missouri. However, the committee's conclusion was based on a preliminary review of available data. The committee, which was not asked to recommend approval for the second generation anthracycline, based its conclusion on an interim analysis of data from three trials comparing idarubicin in combination with cytosine arabinoside to the standard ANLL therapy combination of daunorubicin/cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C). Adria had submitted its final analysis of Phase III data to FDA only four days prior to the committee meeting. Committee member Robert Capizzi, MD, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, North Carolina, emphasized that the committee's opinion is contingent on FDA's analysis of the final data. "If indeed all of the data is in and if indeed all of the data has been appropriately analyzed and if indeed the final analysis is consistent as we have heard this morning, in terms of remission frequency, I think they are comparable." Early in the committee's discussion, members raised questions about the retrospective statistical method used by Adria in evaluating a major study conducted at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center on idarubicin's efficacy when compared to daunorubicin. Steven Piantadosi, MD/PhD, Johns Hopkins Oncology Group, asserted that unquestioning acceptance of the company's statistical interpretation of the study would be tantamount to letting them "sneak in the back door." Interim data from the Sloan-Kettering study of 90 ANLL patients found that idarubicin/Ara-C produced a 78% complete response rate compared to 58% for daunorubicin/Ara-C. The company's second study, conducted by the South Eastern Group showed a complete response rate of 68% idarubicin vs. 54% for daunorubicin. An Adria sponsored trial showed equal response rates for the two drugs. None of the trials found a statistically significant improvement in survival for idarubicin over daunorubicin. Several committee members questioned the comparison of idarubicin against daunorubicin given the less than expected efficacy in the daunorubicin arm of the studies. "The Memorial trial that purports to have a superior response rate for the idarubicin trial versus the daunorubicin trial perhaps looks good because the daunorubicin looks so bad," Capizzi suggested. The daunorubicin experience in the trial "had a response rate that was under the national norm," he said. Idarubicin had significantly higher toxicity than daunorubicin in the consolidation phases of the trials. The side effects included: bleeding in 27% of the idarubicin treated patients compared to 21% for daunorubicin; infections in 74% given idarubicin vs. 55% given daunorubicin; and mucositis in 35% given idarubicin vs. 22% given daunorubicin.

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

LL1135415

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel