Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

FDA DRUG MASTER FILE FINAL GUIDELINE

Executive Summary

FDA DRUG MASTER FILE FINAL GUIDELINE discourages applicants from establishing a drug master file (DMF) when the material to be referenced is contained in the applicant's own IND, NDA or ANDA. The just-released guideline states: "When an applicant references its own material, the applicant should reference the information contained in its own IND, NDA, or ANDA directly rather than establishing a new DMF." Like the draft guideline published in October 1987, the final document instructs applicants to include in their annual updates any changes to the list of persons authorized to reference the file. The "DMF holder should also submit a statement that the list is current . . . if the list is unchanged on the anniversary date," FDA noted. The guideline incorporates proposed revisions to the definitions of the five types of DMFs. The revised definitions are also issued separately as a proposed rule. Both guideline and proposed rule are published in the Oct. 17 Federal Register. The proposed rule and final guideline amend the description of a Type I DMF (manufacturing site, facilities, operating procedures, and personnel) to make clear that the DMF will not generally be necessary for domestic firms. The revised description in the proposed rule states: "Because an FDA on-site inspection of a foreign drug manufacturing facility presents unique problems of planning and travel not presented by an inspection of a domestic facility, this information is only recommended for foreign manufacturing establishments." The proposed rule and guideline also revise the title of Type V DMFs from "preclinical or clinical data" to "FDA-accepted reference information." The proposed rule explains that "the agency has found that the Type V DMF is sometimes used to submit information that is either inappropriate or should be submitted with other documentation. For example, FDA has received clinical data in Type V DMFs that properly should be part of investigational and marketing applications. Therefore, the proposed change is intended to discourage the submission of Type V DMFs for miscellaneous information, duplicate information, or information that should be included in one of the other types of DMFs." The final guideline instructs DMF holders to submit a letter of intent to FDA's DMF staff before submitting information not covered by DMF types I through IV. FDA is accepting comments on the proposed rule and final guideline until Dec. 18. Copies of the guideline may be obtained from FDA's Legislative, Professional, and Consumer Affairs Branch (HFD-365), 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857.

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

LL029263

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel