Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

LYPHOMED's CALSTAT IS SAFE AND EFFECTIVE FOR HYPERCALCEMIA

Executive Summary

LYPHOMED's CALSTAT IS SAFE AND EFFECTIVE FOR HYPERCALCEMIA due to malignancy in cancer patients, FDA's Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee unanimously agreed at an Oct. 13 meeting. Commenting on the data presented at the meeting, Committee Reviewer Alwyn Parfitt, MD, Henry Ford Hospital, said: "This agent is more efficacious in terms of both the magnitude [of calcium reduction], the duration for which the . . . calcium is controlled, and the proportion of patients in whom a satisfactory response is obtained" than other hypercalcemic agents. The panel review of Calstat (gallium nitrate) comes only seven months after the company submitted its NDA for the orphan drug. The NDA is based on an open label Phase I/II study in 32 patients, a comparative study to calcitonin in 50 patients, and an interim study analysis of an ongoing comparative trial to etidronate in 52 patients. The recommended dosage is 200 mg/m of continuous I.V. infusion for up to five days. Although the committee endorsed the drug's approval, panel members suggested a number of changes in the labeling proposed by Lyphomed, including restricting the indication to only symptomatic patients with cancer-related hypercalcemia because of concerns of nephrotoxicity. In an FDA review of Calstat, Medical Officer Sam Dutta, MD, said: "Gallium nitrate continuous intravenous infusion appears to be a potent therapeutic regimen for the acute management of cancer-related hypercalcemia. However, its therapeutic benefits need to be critically evaluated against potential toxicities." To address the toxicity concerns, the committee recommended precautions in the labeling. They included advice that patients be started on a saline solution for 48 hours as a first course of action before resorting to the drug, excluding hematologic malignancies from the indication for lack of data. The committee also recommended cautions about the possibility of a "significant" decrease in blood pressure and to discourage long-term, repeated administrations. Lyphomed presented an overview of the three safety and efficacy trials. The summary showed that the incidence of renal insufficiency in cancer-related hypercalcemia patients occurred in 10% of 67 patients on gallium nitrate, while 8% of the 53 control patients and 9% of 430 patients screened for the studies showed renal insufficiency. In the completed comparative trial, the company reported that 75% of patients treated with gallium nitrate reached normal calcium levels versus 31% in the calcitonin group. Furthermore, the average duration for normocalcemia was six days for the gallium nitrate group compared to one day for the calcitonin group.

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS016389

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel