Pink Sheet is part of the Business Intelligence Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

REP. DINGELL's SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT PROPOSAL

Executive Summary

REP. DINGELL's SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT PROPOSAL would establish an office of scientific review within the office of the HHS assistant secretary for health. Lesley Russell, a staff member on Dingell's (D-Mich.) Energy & Commerce Committee, discussed the draft legislation at the American Association for the Advancement of Sciences annual colloquium on science and technology policy, April 14. Russell said the office would be located within HHS rather than NIH to avoid conflict of interest at NIH and to have a central site to oversee all research funded by the Public Health Service. A name for the office has not been chosen, she added. HHS and NIH have already established review offices. In March, the department formed the Office of Scientific Integrity Review, and NIH formed the Office of Scientific Integrity. When asked why legislation would be needed to establish an office similar to those just formed, Russell pointed out that it is easier for something authorized by Congress to get funding. Reportedly, Sen. Kennedy (D-Mass.) is interested in a companion Senate bill. The Dingell bill would also require institutions to have guidelines in place to prevent misconduct and handle allegations in order to obtain NIH funding. Russell said the bill would exempt research conducted at FDA. Last September PHS announced a proposed rule on scientific misconduct that also requires institutions to have such guidelines. NIH's Janet Newburgh, Office of Extramural Research, told the AAAS session that the proposal was submitted for Office of Management and Budget review 10 days ago. Newburgh noted that the PHS regulation "reflects the conviction that the primary responsibility for investigation continues to be placed with the grantee institutions." She said the regulation also spells out much more clearly than in the past "the characteristics of an appropriate investigation." Newburgh added that NIH staff will work with the assistant secretary for health to develop a compendium of "successful approaches to formal curriculum development in the ethics of biomedical and behavioral research.
Advertisement
Advertisement
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS015440

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel