Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

SCHERING THEO-DUR ANTI-GENERIC SYMPOSIA CALLED FALSE, MISLEADING

Executive Summary

SCHERING THEO-DUR ANTI-GENERIC SYMPOSIA CALLED FALSE, MISLEADING, and lacking in fair balance in a Jan. 27 FDA letter of adverse finding. The letter requests that Schering-Plough "immediately cease" company-sponsored promotional seminars conducted by an unnamed California physician to "local pharmacy association meetings." FDA noted that the physician's comments "contain numerous falsehoods as well as a broad range of misrepresentations and innuendoes regarding competing products." FDA also pointed out that members of Schering-Plough's sales force were present at the meetings. The letter is FDA's second complaint regarding Schering's promotion of Theo-Dur versus other controlled release theophylline products. In February 1987, FDA sent a similar letter to Schering objecting to misleading claims for Theo-Dur in a videotape used by the company's sales force. Noting the earlier letter, FDA said it has "even a greater concern when the person speaking at media appearances or seminars delivers a false and/or misleading message on an ongoing basis under the firm's continuing sponsorship with the firm thereby being aware of the nature of the presentation." FDA also asked Schering to cease disseminating a study in Theo-Dur promotional materials conducted by Baker et al. that makes "an open-ended claim" regarding Theo-Dur's superiority to generics even though the study was limited to "B" rated generics. In addition, FDA called the study "seriously flawed" in that it "fails to make known the availability of 'A' rated products." The FDA letter also objects to Schering "Dear Pharmacist" letters that describe Theo-Dur's absorption as "zero order." The letter of adverse finding was mailed to Schering the day after FDA moved Forest's Theochron 100 mg, 200 mg and once daily use of 300 mg to "AB" rated to Theo-Dur. Previously, only Theochron 300 mg had been rated bioequivalent with the Schering/Key product. Schering management met with officials in FDA's drug standards division on Jan. 30 to voice the company's disapproval over the new "AB" ratings for the Forest product.

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

ID1132090

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel