Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

VACCINE COMPENSATION BASED ON PER-DOSE EXCISE TAX

Executive Summary

VACCINE COMPENSATION BASED ON PER-DOSE EXCISE TAX is included as a compensation funding method contained in budget reconciliation legislation which passed the House by a 206-205 vote on Oct. 29. The authorization of a per-dose vaccine excise tax was made part of the budget reconciliation package, which was considered "highly partisan" by Republicans. Opponents of the the measure said it could threaten the bipartisan economic "budget summit" talks among senators, congressmen, and Reagan Administration officials. The floor debate did not focus on the vaccine compensation provisions. Authorization for the vaccine excise taxes and a federal vaccine compensation trust fund is not expected to be considered by the full Senate. Instead, the measure could move directly to a House/Senate conference, with Senate managers of budget reconciliation accepting the vaccine compensation provision. A budget reconciliation bill has passed the Senate Finance Committee and is currently awaiting budget proposals from other committees before being placed on the Senate calendar. On Oct. 26, separate vaccine compensation legislation was introduced on behalf of the Reagan Administration by Reps. Lent (R-N.Y.) and Duncan (R-Tenn.), respectively the ranking minority members of the House Energy & Commerce Committee and Ways & Means Committee. The Administration proposal would require vaccine manufacturers to provide compensation through private insurance and would establish a Vaccine Compensation Board to adjudicate claims. The Administration approach has not been introduced in the Senate. Merck, which manufactures measles-mumps-rubella vaccine, supports the House-passed bill. However, Lederle, which manufactures diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus vaccine, prefers the Lent-Duncan bill. A Lederle spokesperson said the Administration approach represents "a far superior and more fiscally sound alternative" to vaccine compensation.

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

OM011381

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel