Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

BENDECTIN $95 MIL. JUDGMENT AGAINST MERRELL DOW IN D.C. FEDERAL COURT

Executive Summary

BENDECTIN $95 MIL. JUDGMENT AGAINST MERRELL DOW IN D.C. FEDERAL COURT on July 14 allows the company 10 days to file a motion for reversal or a new trial. "We're going to take every step necessary to reverse this verdict and obtain a ruling in our favor," a Merrell Dow spokesperson said. The D.C. jury presided over by Judge June Green awarded the plaintiff $20 mil. in compensatory damages and $75 mil. in punitive damages. The jury answered 10 questions affirmatively regarding Bendectin's relationship to the plaintiff's deformity and the company's responsibility to warn of risks. The jury, for example, decided that Merrell was "negligent in failing to warn adequately physicians, including Plaintiff Sandra Ealy's physician, of the risks which defendant knew or should have known to be associated with the use of Bendectin in 1978." The D.C. verdict is at least the second Bendectin ruling in which a jury attached a punitive damage award. Last January in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, a jury awarded $2 mil. in punitive damages to a child whose mother took Bendectin prior to giving birth. Merrell Dow has since filed two motions with the trial court judge -- one for a judgment notwithstanding the jury verdict and another for a new trial ("The Pink Sheet" Feb. 2, T&G-6). In the D.C. case (Sekou Ealy v. Richarson-Merrell), Merrell Dow was represented by the firm of Collier, Shannon, Rill & Scott. That firm was successful in December 1986 in getting D.C. Judge Thomas Jackson to overturn a smaller jury award in another Bendectin case ("The Pink Sheet" Feb. 2, T&G-6). Merrell Dow says that it has received favorable jury verdicts in 13 of the 17 trials to date. The current case was tried before an all-female jury. The jurors were employed and ranged in age from late 20's to early 60's. "It is incredible that the jury found that Bendectin caused the child's problem and awarded the grossly excessive amounts in damages," Merrell Dow spokesperson William Donaldson said in a press release issued the day of the verdict.

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS012177

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel