Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

COMBINATION ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES: 40% ENDOMETRIAL CANCER RISK REDUCTION

Executive Summary

COMBINATION ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES: 40% ENDOMETRIAL CANCER RISK REDUCTION was shown in a large epidemiologic case-control study published in the Feb. 13 Journal of the American Medical Association. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) study, based on data from the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study, "found women who had used combination OCs [oral contraceptives] for at least 12 months had an age-adjusted risk of developing endometrial cancer of 0.6 relative to those women who had never used OCs," CDC found. For those who used combination oral contraceptives for longer periods, risk was reduced further, the report states. The relative risk rate for women using combination oral contraceptives for two to 10 years varied between 0.3 and 0.4. The study also examined the relative risks of endometrial cancer for eight different oral contraceptive formulations. Rates were calculated only for formulations that at least six cases had used, and the study notes that cases and controls may have used additional combination oral contraceptives. With a relative risk of 0.2, oral contraceptives containing 50 ug ethinyl estradiol and 0.5 mg norgestrel were associated with the least risk of endometrial cancer, the study states. The highest relative risk was seen with a combination of 75 ug mestranol and 0.5 mg norethynodrel, which was quantified as having a 0.7 relative risk. The report comments that "no difference in effect of various combinations of estrogen and progestin was seen using 'milligram-months' (the composite, cumulative measure of estrogen/progestin dose and months of use)." All of the major oral contraceptive manufacturers, including Syntex, Ortho, Wyeth, Parke-Davis, Searle and Mead Johnson, market combination products. In addition to CDC, the study was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Cancer Institute. The study compares 433 women diagnosed with endometrial cancer, surveyed between Dec. 1, 1980 and Dec. 31, 1982, to 3191 random cancer-free controls. Cases and controls were drawn from Atlanta, Detroit, San Francisco, Seattle, and four Utah counties. Results from an earlier report, also based on the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study, found no link between oral contraceptive use and increased risk of breast cancer ("The Pink Sheet" Aug. 18, T&G-7). The present report notes that its results support findings from eight other studies that found a similar decrease in endometrial cancer risk with oral contraceptive use.

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS011463

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel