Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

AYERST-FUNDED JAMA STUDY's USE OF PRE-WAXMAN/HATCH LAW Rx DRUG PRICES

Executive Summary

AYERST-FUNDED JAMA STUDY's USE OF PRE-WAXMAN/HATCH LAW Rx DRUG PRICES lessens the report's relevance to the current marketplace, National Association of Chain Drug Stores (NACDS) President Robert Bolger maintained in a Nov. 17 letter to the editor of the Journal of the American Medical Association. NACDS considers the study "questionable at best and of very little value in terms of the current marketplace," Bolger wrote. Regarding the timing of the study, Bolger commented: "Why the study is being publicized now is rather perplexing. Why would a company spend so much money to do a study that looks at a landscape that has changed so dramatically in the past two years?" Noting that the published report "examines the marketplace during the narrow time frame of April 1, 1984 to June 30, 1984," NACDS wrote: "This just happens to be a period of time [three months] before congressional enactment of the Drug Price Competition/Patent Term Restoration Act." The NACDS letter was written in response to a study published in the Nov. 14 issue of JAMA. The study examined costs, type of payment, and type of pharmacy involved in the dispensing of approximately 900,000 prescriptions in 1,363 drug stores in 39 states over the three month period ("The Pink Sheet" Nov. 17, T&G-5). The JAMA study focused on 42 Rx drugs: 21 brandname products and their generic equivalents. The authors found that, although pharmacies acquire generic drugs at lower cost than their brandname counterparts, the prices consumers paid for brandname versions of furosemide and conjugated estrogen "were comparable, or the differences were small" in comparison to generic versions. The pioneer versions of those drugs -- Lasix and Premarin, respectively -- represent an early post-1962 drug and a pre-1962 drug. Generic versions have been available for many years, and competition from the generics and more recent drug therapies has driven down the prices of Lasix and Premarin. NACDS cited estimates that the ANDA/patent act "will result in some 150 new generic drug products becoming available." The association noted "industry sources are predicting that these lower priced medications will help save consumers as much as $1 bil. over the next decade."

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS011054

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel