Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

REP. WAXMAN's VACCINE INJURY COMPENSATION BILL PASSES HOUSE COMMERCE CMTE. WITH BIPARTISAN SUPPORT; WAYS & MEANS TO REVIEW EXCISE TAX PROVISION

Executive Summary

A compromise version of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Bill (HR 5546) cleared the House Energy & Commerce Committee on Sept. 18 and is expected to move quickly toward House passage with bipartisan support. Introduced by Commerce/Health Subcommittee Chairman Waxman (D-Calif.) earlier this summer ("The Pink Sheet" July 14, p. 9), the bill did not have the support of Rep. Madigan (R-Ill.), the subcommitee's ranking minority member. However, a Waxman/Madigan compromise was fashioned on Sept. 17, shortly before the measure passed the subcommittee. Changes to Waxman's original proposal include stricter liability standards for claims alleging inadequate warnings and deletion of the negligence standard from the litigation section. When introduced as a clean bill, the compromise was cosponsored by 23 congressmen. Merck is said to be fully supportive of the compromise, while Lederle would prefer further amendments. Under the compromise, the bill no longer stipulates that product liability litigation involving vaccine injury must be based on claims of negligence or wrongful conduct. The earlier version provided that claims based on strict liability or a vaccine manufacturer's failure to warn directly about potential risks would be dismissed. Although the new bill allows claims based on failure to warn, it specifies that claims based on manufacturers' failure to warn individuals directly, rather than their physicians, are inadmissible. The measure also provides a rebuttable presumption that a warning meeting FDA requirements constitutes an adequate warning. Other changes include an amendment offered by Rep. Luken (D-Ohio) that requires HHS to submit to Congress "an assessment of the impact of this act on the supply of vaccines." Under the amendment, HHS report are due on June 30, 1987 and every two years thereafter. A referral to the Ways and Means Committee could turn out to be a hurdle for a quick House passage of the bill. The referral was required under House rules due to the manner in which the bill's federal compensation program is funded: initially through a loan from the federal treasury and subsequently through an excise tax placed on routine childhood vaccines. The Reagan Administration reportedly opposes the bill because of the funding provision. The Ways and Means Committee could waive jurisdiction over the bill and allow referral directly to the full House, where it might be considered under suspension of the rules. Another possibility reportedly being considered is incorporating the vaccine bill and Rep. Dingell's (D-Mich.) drug diversion bill in an omnibus drug legislation to be brought directly to the House floor. Sen. Hawkins (R-Fla.) is said to be encouraged by the apparently revived changes for passage of a vaccine injury compensation bill this year. The Labor and Human Resource Committee deleted a provision for a federal compensation program from her bill (S 827). At the time, Hawkins said she thought such a provision would make S 827 unpassable in the Senate but added that she will offer the provision again if the House passes similar legislation ("The Pink Sheet" Aug. 11, p. 10). The Florida Republican's options include amending her measure on the Senate floor and reconsidering S 827 in committee (the legislation is not currently on the agenda of a meeting scheduled for Sept. 24). She has said she does not want the committee-passed bill to go to conference without compensation provisions if House-passed legislation contains them.

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

LL1126230

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel