Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

RORER CHAIRMAN ECKMAN ASKS CONGRESS FOR MORATORIUM ON HOSTILE TAKEOVERS

Executive Summary

RORER CHAIRMAN ECKMAN ASKS CONGRESS FOR MORATORIUM ON HOSTILE TAKEOVERS in April 3 testimony before the House/Judiciary/Monopolies Subcmte. At a hearing to consider legislation concerning acquisitions and tender offers, Rorer Group Chairman & Chief Exec John Eckman said: "An effective means must be found to deter hostile, coercive, and abusive takeover methods, and to remove incentives for opportunistic raiders, while not preventing corporate combinations that strengthen business operations, and that are effected by means that are fair to all shareholders . . . As the best means of achieving such legislation, we strongly endorse the bill introduced by [subcmte. chairman Rodino (D.N.J.)] providing for a moratorium on hostile takeovers." Eckman maintained "there is probably no other way" than a moratorium "that fair and effective legislation can be developed. A rush to achieve some legislation in the midst of competing economic and regulatory interests will not result in anything but a piecemeal and stop-gap approach to an increasingly serious problem." He added that a legislative moratorium would provide a cooling-off period while Congress examines possible changes in the tax codes and enforcement policies. Rodino's legislation (HR 1831) would establish a study commission to examine current laws, current business practices, and legislative options over a two-year period during which a moratorium would be placed on hostile takeovers. Rodino maintained that "consumers, employees, and stockholders are all best served if management is able to focus on its primary task: maximizing a firm's income potential through innovation and investment in areas in which the firm has expertise." Eckman contended that current laws are contradictory. "On the one hand our tax laws seek to reward research and capital investment for the long-term good of the economy; on the other hand, our tender offer laws and antitrust and securities law enforcement policies discourage investments in both research and capital equipment by forcing management to maximize short-term profits." Banks, he continued, "fall all over themselves to lend capital to finance takeovers, removing equity from capital markets." Separately, in an April 4 letter urging Rorer shareholder opposition to Cooper's proxy solicitation, Eckman was sharply critical of Cooper Chairman Parker Montgomery. The four page letter includes allegations that Montgomery and Cooper officers regularly borrow large sums from Cooper Labs at low interest. In addition, the letter alleges that the Cooper officers attempted to reap a $30 mil. profit from the sale of CooperVision to Nestle in ways not available to other CooperVision shareholders.

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

LL1133546

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel