Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

REED & CARNRICK KWELL PATIENT INSERT MODIFICATION REQUESTED

Executive Summary

REED & CARNRICK KWELL PATIENT INSERT MODIFICATION REQUESTED by FDA's Dermatologic Drugs Advisory Cmte. at its Nov. 5 meeting. Cmte. members criticized the company for not incorporating the cmte.'s previous recommendations into the patient labeling. The cmte. agreed that FDA agreed "generate a synopsis of the agreements" made at their meeting in October 1983 and delay adoption of the proposed patient insert. At the cmte.'s October 1983 meeting, Reed & Carnrick VP-R&D Fred Mallreath told the cmte. its patient information would be based on a pamphlet on treating lice distributed by the Natl. Pediculosis Assn. According to assn. representative Bill Nowak, Reed & Carnrick's patient insert does not include specific warnings against misuse, such as "avoiding a hot bath or shampoo immediately preceeding treatment"; avoiding treatment of "an individual with excoriated scalp or neck area"; and the necessity of "treating over the sink rather than in the bathtub or shower to limit the absorption of lindane." The proposed Kwell (lindane) patient insert included a rebate offer for another product. The cmte. told Reed & Carnrick promotional efforts of that sort are not acceptable. Explaining the agency's position on such product promotion, FDA Anti-Infective Drug Products Div. Director John Tabor, MD, said: "In general, we go to very great efforts to keep promotional efforts out of physician inserts, and I would certainly think the same would apply to patient package inserts." Reed & Carnrick's McIlreath responded that the company had mistakenly included the rebate offer in the patient insert. "I was just as surprised and upset to find that in there as you," McIlreath said. "I don't know what it is doing there . . . Obviously, it was a clerical error."

You may also be interested in...



Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

OM003387

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel