Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By



Executive Summary

U. CALIF. rDNA DELIBERATE RELEASE EXPERIMENT: FEDERAL COURT HALT to the test will drive applied rDNA research out of universities and into the private sector, the University of California, Berkeley, contends in a brief filed in D.C. Circuit Court. In May, D.C. Federal Judge John Sirica issued a preliminary injunction halting a planned university field test of a genetically-altered bacteria designed to make potatoes more frost resistant until NIH prepared an environmental impact statement. "The district court's injunction, if it is left standing, deals a potentially fatal blow to the future of rDNA research in this country," the university argued. "It will drive applied rDNA research from academic institutions into commercial and industrial enterprises that receive no NIH funding." The federal court ruling applies only to research regulated by NIH's rDNA guidelines. Private sector research is not technically affected by the ruling since industry compliance with the NIH guides is voluntary. A separate deliberate release experiment, proposed by Cetus Madison Corp and Advanced Genetic Scienes received proliminary approval by NIH's rDNA Advisory Cmte. NIH Director Wyngaarden is expected to issue a final decision in the near future on the Cetus/Advanced Genetic Sciences proposal. The university, NIH, and the American Council on Education are seeking to overturn the preliminary injunction Sirica granted in response to a lawsuit filed by the Foundation of Economic Trends. The brief contends that the court is demanding the "impossible" of NIH -- that it prepare an environmental impact statement "in order to rensom the scientific work it has taken hostage." No impact statement is possible, the brief contended, "when there is no program." The court's ruling, the school said, has also "crippled NIH's ability to gather pertinent scientific data while demanding that NIH develop criteria for which those data are essential." In a July 28 filing with Sirica, the Foundation on Economic Trends asserted that the ruling should be extended to all licensees of Stanford University's basic rDNA process patent. The group based its contention on the license agreement negotiated between Stanford University and the University of California, San Francisco. When the institutions negotiated a license to the process, both schools sought the govt.'s opinion on rDNA inventions developed under NIH funding. NIH ruled that the licensees of the patent agreement had to provide "assurance of compliance with the physical and biological containment standards set forth in the (BRACKET)NIH rDNA(BRACKET) guidelines," the foundation explained. The group's filing declared: "Advanced Genetic Sciences and Cetus Madison Corp. and the country's other biotechnology companies that found it necessary to become licensees are thus bound under the (BRACKET)patent(BRACKET) agreement to comply with the guidelines." Therefore, the filing arues, "licensee-biotechnology firms are under as strong a compulsion as are NIH-funded entities such as the University of California, Berkeley, to obtain NIH approval. Indeed, the compulsion is stronger; the latter institutions would only lose funding; (BRACKET)Advanced Genetic Sciences(BRACKET) and other licensees face losing their right to conduct such experiments if they should proceed without NIH approval."

You may also be interested in...

Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data

Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011

FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance

FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials

Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund

Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth




Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts