Biomarkers In Labeling Lack Clinical Utility Evidence
This article was originally published in Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly
FDA-approved labels for more than 100 drugs feature pharmacogenomic biomarker data, but only one-sixth of those biomarkers are supported by data showing a clear association with health benefits, a JAMA study found. Researchers recommend stricter standards and a standardized pharmacogenomics section of labeling.
You may also be interested in...
Pharmacogenetic biomarkers for molecularly targeted therapies are supported by considerably better evidence that they improve patient outcomes than biomarkers in labeling of untargeted drugs, but a JAMA study still found that half of biomarkers in label lacked convincing evidence of clinical utility.
An FDA/industry workshop on pharmacogenomics and biomarkers highlighted how far the regulatory system for PKG has evolved. Where industry was afraid to share data with FDA, the conversation is now about how to get the agency the resources it needs to review the data effectively.
The overall message of three trials published recently in The New England Journal of Medicine: “This pharmacogenetic testing has either no usefulness in the initial dosing of vitamin K antagonists or, at best, marginal usefulness, given the cost and effort required to perform this testing,” according to an editorial also in NEJM.