Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Merck/Ariad’s Hopes For Ridaforolimus May Rest Beyond Sarcoma After FDA Rejection

This article was originally published in Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly

Executive Summary

In a “complete response” letter, the agency said it wanted more clinical data on use of the mTOR inhibitor as a maintenance therapy in metastatic soft tissue or bone sarcoma. Merck says it is confident in ridaforolimus’ potential and points to an active development program in various solid tissue cancers.

You may also be interested in...



FDA Opts For Full, Rather Than Accelerated, Approval Of GSK’s Votrient In Sarcoma

Despite advisory committee discussion about a possible accelerated approval for pazopanib with a confirmatory study to assess symptom benefit, the agency opted to grant regular approval, as had been requested by GlaxoSmithKline.

Cancer Therapies Should Be Held To Higher Bar In Maintenance Setting, ODAC Says

In their review of Merck/Ariad’s Taltorvic (ridaforolimus) for sarcoma patients with stable disease, members of FDA’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee suggested the nature of maintenance therapy necessitates that efficacy be more robust, and toxicities less of a concern, than in the treatment setting.

Tale Of Two Sarcoma Drugs: ODAC Gives Nod To GSK’s Votrient, Thumbs Down On Merck/Ariad’s Taltorvic

FDA’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee deems the three-month median progression-free survival benefit with GlaxoSmithKline’s pazopanib clinically meaningful and views accelerated approval as a means for acquiring more efficacy data, particularly on symptom benefit. In contrast, panel says smaller median PFS benefit seen with Merck and Ariad’s ridaforolimus, coupled with its toxicities, makes it inappropriate in the maintenance setting.

Topics

Related Companies

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS005127

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel