Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Boehringer Will Test How Pradaxa Stacks Up To The Competition In Real-World Study

This article was originally published in Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly

Executive Summary

Global observational study is assessing real-world experience with Pradaxa and other anticoagulants in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation who are at risk of stroke. Results are due in 2020.

You may also be interested in...



Xarelto Approval For AF Stroke Risk Reduction Tested FDA’s Comparative Efficacy Powers, But Conservative View Prevailed

J&J/Bayer’s Xarelto tested the limits of FDA’s policy on comparative efficacy, thanks to suboptimal use of the active comparator, warfarin, and the introduction of a new competitor, Pradaxa. In the medical reviewers’ view, new therapies should be as effective as existing therapies used skillfully, but division leadership would withhold approval only if the new drug were clearly inferior to approved agents.

Xarelto Filing Puts It Out Ahead In Venous Thromboembolism

Though other novel anticoagulants are in development for treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism, Janssen and its partner Bayer are hoping Xarelto will be coming out ahead.

Xarelto Tested FDA’s Comparative Efficacy Powers, But Conservative View Prevailed

J&J/Bayer’s Xarelto tested the limits of FDA’s policy on comparative efficacy, thanks to suboptimal use of the active comparator, warfarin, and the introduction of a new competitor, Pradaxa. In the medical reviewers’ view, new therapies should be as effective as existing therapies used skillfully, but division leadership would withhold approval only if the new drug were clearly inferior to approved agents.

Related Content

Topics

Related Companies

Latest News
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS005086

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel