Provenge Panel's Uncertainty Was More Persuasive To FDA Than Its Vote
This article was originally published in Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly
FDA found the uncertainty expressed by the advisory committee reviewing Dendreon’s Provenge to be a better guide for regulatory action than the panel’s numerical vote supporting approval, according to the FDA review documents for the first autologous cancer vaccine.
You may also be interested in...
Medivation/Astellas’ enzalutamide capped off an extraordinary three-year run in advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer therapy, with three successive NMEs each offering a greater survival advantage than the last. That accelerated evolution of new therapies created a complex context for FDA reviews.
Out Of The Shadow Of REMS: FDA Review Documents Show Emerging Importance Of Post-Marketing Requirements
Although often overshadowed by the novelty of FDA’s sweeping authority in constructing Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies, examination of agency review documents suggest that the FDA Amendments Act’s other safety innovation, granting FDA the ability to require (i.e., enforce) post-marketing studies, is increasingly important to the approval of NDAs with marginal data on issues of concern.