Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By


Phase III for Affymax's ESA Hematide to finish by year-end

This article was originally published in Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly

Executive Summary

Phase III trials of Affymax/Takeda's erythropoiesis-stimulating agent Hematide will wrap-up by year-end, Affymax announced Sept. 9. The 400 clinical trial sites will complete treatment of patients by the end of 2009, a timeline allowed due to the firms securing of $42 million in private and public financing in February (1"The Pink Sheet" DAILY, Feb. 17, 2009). The Phase III program includes 2,600 chronic renal failure patients enrolled in four open-label non-inferiority trials. Two of the trials are in patients on dialysis, and are evaluating Hematide's ability to maintain hemoglobin levels in the target range when patients are switched from epoetin alfa or epoetin beta. The other two trials are in patients not on dialysis, and are comparing Hematide to darbepoetin alfa in correcting anemia and maintaining hemoglobin levels over time. The controversy over safety problems with ESAs for chemotherapy-induced anemia caused the firms to suspend development last year of Hematide for that population (2"The Pink Sheet" DAILY, Aug. 29, 2008). The companies expect to report top-line results and file the NDA in 2010

You may also be interested in...

Affymax Swings $42 Million Financing To Push Hematide

Private/public infusion will see synthetic ESA through trials and approval.

The Future Of ESAs – Is It All CKD Now?

Takeda and Affymax revise Hematide program to stop development for chemotherapy-induced anemia and focus on anemia related to chronic kidney disease.

Cosmetics Europe Talks Microplastic: ECHA Frustrations, ‘Value Judgments’ And International Trade Uncertainty

The European Chemicals Agency's microplastic restriction proposal received committee backing in 2020 without changes sought by the cosmetics industry, which faces €15bn in projected costs and scarce alternatives at present. It may come down to EU Member States to decide whether the ECHA restriction proposal is proportionate in balancing environmental goals and socio-economic impacts.





Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts