Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Two botulinum toxin BLAs become one approval

This article was originally published in Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly

Executive Summary

FDA's April 30 approval of Ipsen's botulinum neurotoxin type A complex reunited therapeutic and cosmetic indications that the company had pursued separately. Ipsen kept the therapeutic use (treatment of cervical dystonia) for itself and licensed cosmetic use for wrinkles, or glabellar lines, to Medicis. The cervical dystonia use was submitted as Dysport and the glabellar lines BLA was submitted as Reloxin in late 2007. The BLAs followed different paths before FDA converted Reloxin into an efficacy supplement under the Dysport (abobotulinumtoxinA) BLA - and united the products under the Dysport name - for approval. The review appears to have been marked by risk management issues: a user fee extension so FDA could review a risk communication plan was followed by a Dec. 29, 2008, "complete response" letter requesting a REMS. The BLA itself was also an issue: FDA refused to file Reloxin in late 2007 due to administrative issues; it was resubmitted March 12, 2008. FDA later extended the user fee goal from January 2009 to April 13, 2009

You may also be interested in...



Interview: Theradaptive To Enter Clinical Trial For Spinal Fusion Gel

Theradaptive, which makes a device-biologic combination product to help speed bone healing, recently got authorization to start human trials from the US FDA. Medtech Insight spoke to CEO Luis Alvarez about the company’s past, present and future.

US FDA Expects Joint AdComm Briefing Document, Oncology Chief Says

The combined format is the new default for briefing advisory committee members, US FDA Oncology Center of Excellence Director Pazdur declared.

Parallel Scientific Advice: Is The EMA User Fee Impacting Interest?

EMA charges participants to receive scientific advice through the fledgling program, unlike the US FDA, which may not fit the budgets of some complex generic sponsors. At the same time, sponsors also may simply not be aware the program exists yet.

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS004153

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel