PTI’s Oxytrex “Worth One More Shot” After Phase III Study Spoiled By Vioxx
This article was originally published in Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly
Inappropriate enrollment of former Vioxx patients in Pain Therapeutics’ Phase III trial of Oxytrex for severe osteoarthritic pain undermined the study’s statistical power and necessitates a new trial, according to PTI.
You may also be interested in...
Pain Therapeutics' new trial design for Oxytrex features ultra-low doses and a four-times-a-day dosing regimen, CEO Remi Barbier said May 4
Merck drops Pargluva partnership: Additional trials needed to support approval of Bristol-Myers Squibb's Pargluva (muraglitazar) type 2 diabetes treatment prompt Merck to drop out of its co-development partnership with BMS. Bristol remains in discussions with FDA about what clinical studies would be required to settle questions about the cardiovascular safety of the dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist. Merck and Bristol announced FDA's "approvable" action, based on cardiovascular safety concerns, on Oct. 18. The firms subsequently determined that approval and commercial success would require additional trials that could take up to five years. Pargluva is not the first PPAR agent to succumb to safety issues: Novo Nordisk/Dr. Reddy's ragaglitazar and Merck/Kyorin's MK-0767 were discontinued in 2003 in Phase III due to animal carcinogenicity findings, and AstraZeneca pushed back a planned Galida (tesaglitazar) NDA to 2007 to gather longer-term safety data (1Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly July 2005, p. 24)…
Redeeming a priority review voucher obtained by developing a drug for a tropical disease will cost companies $6.1 million in fiscal 2011