Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

CVT Ranexa complete response

This article was originally published in Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly

Executive Summary

CV Therapeutics submits its "complete response" to an October 2003 "approvable" letter for its angina treatment Ranexa (ranolazine) July 27. The amendment seeks a narrowed indication based on the FDA-requested ERICA (Evaluation of Ranolazine in Chronic Angina) study of patients refractory to Pfizer's Norvasc (amlodipine), which compared the partial fatty acid oxidation inhibitor plus the maximum labeled dose (10 mg) of Norvasc to Norvasc alone. CVT has said that the 0.4 attack/week reduction seen in ERICA was sufficient for an indication for a restricted population, despite being less than half the projected 1.0-1.2 reduction (1Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly May 2005, p. 10). Assuming a six-month review of the amendment, Ranexa could launch in the first half of 2006...

CV Therapeutics submits its "complete response" to an October 2003 "approvable" letter for its angina treatment Ranexa (ranolazine) July 27. The amendment seeks a narrowed indication based on the FDA-requested ERICA (Evaluation of Ranolazine in Chronic Angina) study of patients refractory to Pfizer's Norvasc (amlodipine), which compared the partial fatty acid oxidation inhibitor plus the maximum labeled dose (10 mg) of Norvasc to Norvasc alone. CVT has said that the 0.4 attack/week reduction seen in ERICA was sufficient for an indication for a restricted population, despite being less than half the projected 1.0-1.2 reduction (1 Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly May 2005, p. 10). Assuming a six-month review of the amendment, Ranexa could launch in the first half of 2006....

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS002990

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel